I was pointed, that the ban on certain topics it to say the least outrageous. A topic pointed was that of women and the churh. And I have to say that I agree.

Further, I believe the same applies to end-time discussion. The terms for both of these issues are overly draconic.

The reason I suggested these limits in the first place is, that in my experience people tend to be strongly opinionated and unwilling to reconsider their opinions, resulting in fierce fights where the only thing that changes is mutual respect that turns into mutual hatred.

However I was pointed, that rather than tell you to be responsible, I should actually give you the chance to be responsible, and trust that you can behave. Trust that you actually are both able and willing to put down your strong opinions, listen to other, and when need be, change your mind.

Therefore, the portion of the text above that says: “While my vision is that… 4) Discussion about women as priests.” Will in the TOS be changed in the form:

“My vision is that people who love Christ can do whatever they like in this service. I trust that as mature Christians you don’t abuse this trust by starting to quarrel about such secondary issues as the when or how the Earth was created or when or how we should baptize people. No matter what is the topic, quarrel is not the way of a Christian.”

This change is effective immediately and is already reflected in the TOS registering people need to accept.

I thank you for the feedback. Could I have some more?